|
The Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986 (Proposition 65)
provides two mechanisms for administratively listing chemicals which
are known to the State to cause reproductive toxicity or cancer
(Health and Safety Code Section 25249.8(b)). One such mechanism
involves the listing of chemicals that a body, considered to be
authoritative by the states qualified experts, formally identifies
as causing cancer or reproductive toxicity. As the lead agency for
the implementation of Proposition 65, the Office of Environmental
Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) of the California Environmental
Protection Agency reviews candidates for listing pursuant to this
administrative mechanism as provided in Health and Safety Code Section 25249.8(b)
and Title 22, California Code of Regulations, Section 12306 (22
CCR 12306).
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA), an authoritative
body for purposes of Proposition 65 (22 CCR Section 12306(l)), identifies
chemicals as causing developmental or reproductive toxicity in implementing
its Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) program (i.e., Section 313
of the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act of 1986
(EPCRA)). On this basis the U.S. EPA, in 1994, added a number of
chemicals to the TRI list and published its inclusions to the list
in the Federal Register (59:1788-1859, 1994 and 59:61432-61485,
1994). OEHHA has reviewed the bases for these TRI chemical additions
in the context of the regulatory criteria governing Proposition
65 listing via the authoritative bodies mechanism (22 CCR 12306).
OEHHA determined for several TRI chemicals that the 22 CCR 12306
regulatory criteria were met and is in the process of placing these
chemicals on the Proposition 65 list of chemicals known to cause
reproductive toxicity. OEHHA has determined that these same regulatory
criteria have not been met for some of the chemicals added by U.S.
EPA in 1994 to the TRI list on the basis of reproductive or developmental
toxicity. One of these chemicals is listed in the table below. Four
other lists of chemicals (nine chemicals, five chemicals, two chemicals,
and one chemical) not meeting these criteria were previously published
(California Regulatory Notice Register (CRNR), March 19, 1999;
May 21, 1999; June 18, 1999, and June 25, 1999, respectively). In
each case, the scientific criteria for "as causing reproductive
toxicity" given in regulation (22 CCR 12306(g)) were
not satisfied.
TRI chemical not meeting the scientific criteria (22 CCR 12306(g))
for authoritative bodies listing as causing reproductive toxicity
under Proposition 65
| Chemical |
CAS No.
|
| Sulprofos |
35400-43-2
|
Download the document providing
more detail in PDF format
(recomended for printing).
Questions regarding this notice should be directed to:
Ms. Cynthia Oshita
Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment
Post Office Box 4010
Sacramento, CA 95812-4010
Fax No.: (916) 327-1097
Telephone: (916) 445-6900
You will need the free program Adobe Acrobat Reader to view or
print PDF files 
For questions regarding Proposition 65, please contact the Cynthia
Oshita in the Proposition 65 Implementation Program
For help with this web site please contact the Web
Mistress
|